Table of Contents
Childhood Traumatic Events Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Childhood Traumatic Events Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Childhood Traumatic Events Scale
Author Details
Pennebaker, J.W. & Susman, J.R.
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Childhood Traumatic Events Scale (CTES) is commonly utilized, including in a study on IC/BPS (interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome), to evaluate the presence and impact of past traumatic events during childhood. The CTES examines traumatic experiences that occurred before the age of 17, encompassing various domains such as the death of a family member or close friend, parental divorce or separation, traumatic sexual encounters (e.g., rape, molestation), being a victim of violence (e.g., child abuse, assault), severe illness injury, and other significant disruptions. Each question in the scale prompts participants to provide information about the age at which the trauma occurred, their perceived intensity of the trauma, and whether they confided in others about it.
The Recent Traumatic Events Scale (RTES) assesses the same domains with a few exceptions: the timeframe considered is within the last 3 years, parental separation is replaced with separation/divorce from a spouse or significant other, and a new category of job change included.
Both the CTES and RTES employ rating scales to gauge the severity of trauma as perceived by the participants. Each domain is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates no exposure, 1 represents not at all traumatic, 4 signifies somewhat traumatic, and 7 denotes extremely traumatic experiences. To quantify the assessment of childhood traumatic burden, the scores for each of the six domains on theES are summed, resulting in a score known as the “childhood traumatic burden” that ranges from 0 to 42 (6 domains multiplied by a maximum rating of 7 for each domain). Similarly, the recent traumatic burden is calculated based on ratings obtained from the RTES.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
Familiarization: Review the manual or guidelines provided by the test publisher to understand the administration procedures, scoring criteria, and interpretation guidelines.
Preparation: Ensure that you have all the necessary materials, such as test booklets, answer sheets, scoring keys, and any required equipment (e.g., stopwatch, audio recorder).
Environment: Create a quiet and comfortable testing environment that minimizes distractions and ensures privacy.
Instructions: Provide clear and standardized instructions to the individual being assessed, ensuring they understand the purpose of the assessment and any specific guidelines for responding.
Administration: Follow the prescribed procedures for presenting the test items or questions to the individual. This may involve reading aloud the items, showing visual stimuli, or providing response options.
Timing: Some tests have time limits for completing sections or items. Use a stopwatch or timer to ensure accurate timing if required.
Scoring: After the individual completes the assessment, score their responses according to the guidelines provided in the test manual. This may involve tallying correct answers, converting raw scores to standardized scores, or using computerized scoring software.
Interpretation: Once the scores are obtained, interpret the results comparing them to established norms or cutoffs. Consider the individual’s performance in relation to the intended construct being measured.
Reporting: Prepare a report summarizing the assessment results, including the individual’s scores, strengths, weaknesses, and any relevant recommendations for further evaluation or intervention.
Reliability and Validity
N/A
Available Versions
13-Items
Reference
Pennebaker, J.W. & Susman, J.R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and psychosomatic processes. Social Science and Medicine, 26, 327-332.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Childhood Traumatic Events Scale (CTES)?
The Childhood Traumatic Events Scale (CTES) is a tool used to assess the presence and impact past traumatic events experienced during childhood.
Who are the authors of the CTES?
The CTES was developed by J.W. Pennebaker and J.R. Sus.
What does the CTES measure?
The CTES measures traumatic experiences that occurred before the age of 17, including domains such as death of a family member or close friend, parental divorce separation, traumatic sexual encounters, being a victim of violence, severe illness or injury, and other significant disruptions.
How is the CTES administered?
To administer the CTES, familiarize yourself with the manual or guidelines provided by the test publisher. Create a quiet and comfortable testing environment, provide clear instructions to the individual being assessed, and follow the prescribed procedures for presenting the questions.
How is the severity of trauma measured in the CTES?
The CTES uses a rating scale ranging from 0 to 7 to gauge the severity of trauma. Each domain assigned a score, where 0 indicates no exposure, 1 represents not at all traumatic, 4 signifies somewhat traumatic, and 7 denotes extremely traumatic experiences.
How is the assessment of childhood traumatic burden calculated?
The childhood traumatic burden is calculated by summing the scores for each of the six domains on the CTES. The resulting score ranges from 0 to 42.
Is there a recent traumatic events scale similar to the CTES?
Yes, there is a Recent Traumatic Events Scale (RTES) that assesses similar domains but focuses on traumatic events within the last 3 years.
Are there different versions of the CTES available?
The available version of the CTES consists of 13 items.
Is there information on translation availability for the CTES?
The text does not provide specific information about the availability of translations for the CTES.
Are there guidelines for scoring and interpreting the CTES?
Yes, it is important to review the manual or guidelines provided by the test publisher for scoring and interpretation instructions specific to the CTES.
there information on the reliability and validity of the CTES?
The text does not provide information on the reliability and validity of the CTES.
What is the reference for the CTES?
The reference for the CTES is Pennebaker, J.W. & Susman, J.R. (1988). “Disclosure of traumas and psychosomatic processes.” Social Science and Medicine, 26, 327-332.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
