Table of Contents
Pittsburgh Youth Study – Seriousness of Violence Classification
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Pittsburgh Youth Study – Seriousness of Violence Classification”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Pittsburgh Youth Study – Seriousness of Violence Classification
Author Details
Rolf Loeber, David P. Farrington, Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, and Ronald J. Van Kammen
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) is a measurement tool used in the Pittsburgh Youth Study conducted by Loeber, Farrington, Stouthamer-Loeber, and Van Kammen in 1998. The study aimed to examine the development and progression of violence among male students initially in grades 1, 4, and 7 in 1987 or 1988, and followed into adulthood.
The SOVC is designed to assess the highest level of violence reached by a youth during a specified assessment period, which could be either six months or one year. It consists of five items that help classify the seriousness of violent behavior exhibited by the participants. The classification system allows for differentiating between various levels of violent acts.
While I don’t have access to the specific details of the five items included in the SOVC as outlined in the study by Loeber et al. (1998), it is likely that the items would pertain to the nature and severity of violent acts committed by the youth, such as the presence or absence of weapons, injury inflicted, intent, or the degree of harm caused to the victim.
The Pittsburgh Youth Study has been a valuable resource in understanding the development of antisocial behavior, including violence, among young males and the long-term outcomes associated with such behavior. It provides insights into risk factors, protective factors, and patterns of violent behavior over time.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
The administration of the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) in the Pittsburgh Youth Study involved the assessment of male students initially in grades 1, 4, and 7 in 1987 or 1988. These students were followed over an extended period, tracking their behaviors and levels of violence.
While I don’t have access to the specific administration procedures outlined in the study by Loeber et al. (1998), typically, the administration of the SOVC would involve gathering data through various methods. These methods may include interviews, self-report questionnaires, behavioral observations, and possibly data collected from other sources such as school records, official reports, or criminal justice records.
The researchers likely utilized a combination of quantitative and qualitative measures to assess the seriousness of violence exhibited by the participants during the specified assessment period, which could be either six months or one year. The collected data would then be used to classify the severity of violent acts based on predefined criteria or scales, as developed by the researchers.
The goal of administering the SOVC in the Pittsburgh Youth Study was to gain a comprehensive understanding of the development and progression of violence among the participants, allowing for insights into risk factors, protective factors, and patterns of violent behavior over time.
Reliability and Validity
The reliability and validity of the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) in the Pittsburgh Youth Study were assessed to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the measurement tool. While I don’t have access to specific reliability and validity measures reported in the study by Loeber et al. (1998), I can provide information on how these aspects are typically evaluated in research.
Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of measurement. In the context of the SOVC, it would involve assessing the consistency of the classification of violence severity over time and across different raters or evaluators. Researchers may use measures such as inter-rater reliability, where multiple raters independently classify the seriousness of violence and their agreement is evaluated using statistical measures such as Cohen’s kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients. Test-retest reliability could also be examined by administering the SOVC to a subsample of participants on two separate occasions and assessing the consistency of their violence classifications.
Validity refers to the extent to which a measurement tool accurately measures what it intends to measure. In the case of the SOVC, the researchers would have sought to establish its validity in capturing the seriousness of violence. Content validity would involve ensuring that the items included in the classification system adequately represent the various dimensions or indicators of violence severity. Construct validity could be examined by exploring how well the SOVC aligns with other established measures of aggression or violence, demonstrating its ability to distinguish between different levels of violent behavior. Convergent validity and discriminant validity could also be assessed by examining the correlations of the SOVC with related constructs (e.g., antisocial behavior) and unrelated constructs, respectively.
To establish the reliability and validity of the SOVC, the researchers may have employed statistical analyses and conducted thorough psychometric evaluations based on their study population and data. It is essential to consult the original study by Loeber et al. (1998) for specific details on the reliability and validity of the SOVC in the Pittsburgh Youth Study.
Available Versions
05-Items
Reference
Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. B. (1998). The Prediction of Violence and Homicide in Young Men. In Violence and Serious Theft: Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood (pp. XXX-XXX). Routledge.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) in the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) is a measurement tool used in the Pittsburgh Youth Study. It aims to assess and classify the highest level of violence reached by youth participants during a specified assessment period of either six months or one year.
Q: Who conducted the Pittsburgh Youth Study and developed the SOVC?
A: The Pittsburgh Youth Study was conducted by Rolf Loeber, David P. Farrington, Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, and Ronald J. Van Kammen. These researchers developed the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) as part of their study.
Q: What was the objective of the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The Pittsburgh Youth Study aimed to investigate the development and progression of violence among male students. It followed participants from grades 1, 4, and 7 in 1987 or 1988 into adulthood, providing insights into the long-term outcomes associated with violent behavior.
Q: How is the SOVC administered in the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The specific administration procedures of the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) in the Pittsburgh Youth Study are not readily available. However, it likely involved collecting data through various methods such as interviews, self-report questionnaires, behavioral observations, and possibly accessing data from school records or official reports.
Q: What is known about the reliability and validity of the SOVC in the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: While specific details of reliability and validity measures may not be accessible without referring to the original study by Loeber et al. (1998), it is typical for researchers to assess the reliability of the SOVC by examining inter-rater reliability or test-retest reliability. Validity is established by assessing content validity, construct validity, and measures of convergent and discriminant validity.
Q: What are the contributions of the Pittsburgh Youth Study and the SOVC?
A: The Pittsburgh Youth Study and the Seriousness of Violence Classification (SOVC) have contributed valuable insights into the development and progression of violent behavior among male participants. The study provides a better understanding of risk factors, protective factors, and patterns of violent behavior over time, aiding in the prevention and intervention efforts related to youth violence.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
