Emotional Indicators in Children’s Human Figure Drawings: An Evaluation of the Draw-A-Person Test

by Psychology Roots
34 views
A+A-
Reset

Emotional Indicators in Children’s Human Figure Drawings: An Evaluation of the Draw-A-Person Test

Here in this post, we are sharing the full Psychology thesis on “Emotional Indicators in Children’s Human Figure Drawings: An Evaluation of the Draw-A-Person Test“. You can read the abstract of the thesis with a download link.  We have thousands of thesis in our collection (See articles). You can demand us any article related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you within a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

Abstract of the thesis

The aim of this thesis is to evaluate the Draw-A-Person test and its clinical validity. In a series of 11 studies, the human figure drawings (HFDs) of children with emotional/behavioural difficulties (EBD) were compared to normally adjusted children, matched either for chronological age (CA), mental age (MA) or Goodenough-Harris (GH) scaled scores. Several different measures were considered: original Koppitz (1968) emotional indicator scores, revised indicator scores based on new normative data, an intuitive method of identification and ratings of bizarreness.

Emotional Indicators in Children's Human Figure Drawings: An Evaluation of the Draw-A-Person Test

Emotional Indicators in Children’s Human Figure Drawings: An Evaluation of the Draw-A-Person Test


The original and revised emotional indicators, and both expert and novice judges using the intuitive method, failed to discriminate between mildly disturbed children’s HFDs and those of controls matched for CA or MA. The indicators and judges were successful, however, using more severely disturbed children’s drawings compared with both CA and MA matched children’s HFDs. The severely disturbed children’s drawings were also rated as more highly bizarre than the CA and MA controls. When the severely disturbed children’s drawings were compared to GH matched control HFDs, the emotional indicator differences disappeared and the judges were no longer able to discriminate the drawings successfully.
No differences were found between the clinical and GH matched HFDs for ratings of bizarreness. Also, the ratings did not alter when the indicators were removed from the drawings. Visual differences were found between subsamples of drawings which were classified as disturbed or normal. These differences relate to variables involved in the GH scale and a factor discovered by Adler (1970) measuring cognitive maturity. The results of this thesis have implications for the Koppitz indicators and the use of the DAP test. Questions are raised over the interpretation of HFDs for emotional health. The influence of cognitive maturity on the drawings of disturbed children is considered and the results are discussed in the light of drawing theories which consider either the internal representation or production process as paramount.

Researcher of the Thesis 

  • Michelle Catte

Avail Thesis [sociallocker id=64051]

[/sociallocker]

Need help in Research:

Are you struggling in research? Don’t Worry, We provide you with complete guidance and support free and quickly. Just need to create a query in our community. We also offer paid services such as:

  • Thesis writing
  • Article writing
  • Statistical analysis
  • Reference according to APA
  • APA Formatting
  • Supervisions
  • Courses and Training

Contact us for the best quality free and paid services. info@psychologyroots.com or (+92-3336800644)

Information:

The purpose of our website is only to help students to assist them in finding the best suitable instrument for their research especially in Pakistan where students waste a lot of time in search of the instruments. It is totally free of cost and only for creating awareness and assisting students and researchers for good researches. Moreover, it is necessary for you to take the permission of scales from their representative authors before use because copyrights are reserved by the respected authors.

Help Us Improve This Article

Did you find an inaccuracy? We work hard to provide accurate and scientifically reliable information. If you have found an error of any kind, please let us know.
Add comment. we appropriate your effort.

Share with Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.