Table of Contents
Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire
Scale Name
Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire
Author Details
Arnold H. Buss and Mark Perry
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) was developed in 1992 by Arnold H. Buss and Mark Perry. It is a self-report questionnaire that measures four aspects of aggression: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. The BPAQ was developed to address the limitations of previous measures of aggression, such as the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). The BDHI was a widely used measure of aggression, but it had a number of psychometric problems, such as low internal consistency and poor convergent validity.
The BPAQ was developed using a rigorous scientific process. The authors first generated a large pool of items that they believed were relevant to the measurement of aggression. These items were then pilot tested on a sample of college students. The authors then used factor analysis to identify the four subscales of the BPAQ: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility.
The BPAQ is a 29-item questionnaire that is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Each item is a statement about aggressive behavior or attitudes. Participants are asked to indicate how characteristic each statement is of them. Two of the items are reverse-scored.
The BPAQ is a reliable and valid measure of aggression. It has been used in a wide range of research studies, and it is considered to be the gold standard measure of aggression in adults. The BPAQ has also been translated into multiple languages and used in research studies around the world.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
To administer the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), you will need to obtain a copy of the questionnaire and provide it to the participant. You can provide the questionnaire in a variety of ways, such as in paper-and-pencil format, online, or via an app.
Once the participant has the questionnaire, they should be instructed to read each item carefully and rate it on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (“extremely uncharacteristic of me”) to 5 (“extremely characteristic of me”). Two of the items are reverse-scored, so be sure to instruct the participant to read all of the items carefully.
Here are some tips for administering the BPAQ:
- Provide the participant with a quiet and private place to complete the questionnaire.
- Instruct the participant to read each item carefully and rate it honestly.
- Remind the participant that there are no right or wrong answers.
- If the participant has any questions, answer them clearly and concisely.
- Once the participant has completed the questionnaire, thank them for their time.
Reliability and Validity
The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) is a reliable and valid measure of aggression. It has been used in a wide range of research studies, and it is considered to be the gold standard measure of aggression in adults.
The reliability of a measure refers to its consistency. A reliable measure will produce similar results when it is administered to the same person multiple times. The BPAQ has been shown to have high reliability, with internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) typically above .80. Test-retest reliability coefficients have also been shown to be high, with correlations typically above .70.
The validity of a measure refers to its accuracy. A valid measure will measure what it is intended to measure. The BPAQ has been shown to have high validity, with evidence from both convergent and discriminant validity studies. Convergent validity refers to the degree to which a measure correlates with other measures of the same construct. The BPAQ has been shown to correlate highly with other measures of aggression, such as the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI) and the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS). Discriminant validity refers to the degree to which a measure does not correlate with measures of other constructs. The BPAQ has been shown to have low correlations with measures of other constructs, such as anxiety and depression.
Available Versions
29-Items
Reference
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 452.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the BPAQ?
The BPAQ is a self-report questionnaire that measures four aspects of aggression: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility.
How do I score the BPAQ?
To score the BPAQ, add up the ratings for all of the items. The total score for each subscale is the sum of the ratings for the items in that subscale. The total score for aggression is the sum of the scores for the four subscales.
How do I interpret the BPAQ scores?
There is no single “normal” score on the BPAQ. Aggression is a complex phenomenon, and it is influenced by a variety of factors. However, people who score high on the BPAQ are more likely to engage in aggressive behavior than people who score low.
Is the BPAQ reliable?
Yes, the BPAQ is a reliable measure of aggression. It has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Is the BPAQ valid?
Yes, the BPAQ is a valid measure of aggression. It has high convergent and discriminant validity.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
1 comment
Instead of “What is a psychologist and what does they do?,” it would be best to change it to “. . . and what do they do?”