Home Scales The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

by Psychology Roots
2 views
A+A-
Reset

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

Scale Name

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

Author Details

Leslie J. Francis, Abdullah Sahin, and Fahad Al-Failakaw

Leslie J Francis
Warwick Religions & Education Research Unit, Centre for Education Studies
The University of Warwick
Coventry CV4 7AL United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)24 7652 2539
Fax: +44 (0)24 7657 2638
Email: leslie.francis@warwick.ac.uk

Translation Availability

Urdu

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam
The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam

Background/Description

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam Revised is a 23-item self-report measure concerned with affective responses to Islamic religiosity, including the Qur’ān, prayer, religious practices, and belief in Allah/God. The items are rated on a five-point Likert scale: agree strongly (5), agree (4), not certain (3), disagree (2), and disagree strongly (1).

There are no negatively worded items. Frequency of reciting the Qur’ān was assessed on a five-point scale: never (1), sometimes (2), at least once a month (3), weekly (4), and daily (5). Feeling that life is being guided by God was assessed on a four-point scale: no (1), perhaps but not really sure (2), probably but I am not really certain (3), and yes definitely (4). Religious experience was assessed on a four-point scale: no (1), perhaps but not really sure (2), probably but I am not really certain (3), and yes definitely (4)

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

  • Introduce the study. Explain the purpose of the study and the procedures involved.
  • Provide informed consent. Give participants an opportunity to ask questions and ensure they understand their participation is voluntary and confidential.
  • Distribute the questionnaire. Provide participants with the questionnaire and answer sheets (if using paper and pencil) or access to the online survey.
  • Give clear instructions. Explain how to complete the questionnaire and answer the questions. Emphasize the importance of reading each item carefully and responding honestly to their own beliefs and feelings.
  • Allow sufficient time. Give participants enough time to complete the questionnaire without feeling rushed.
  • Collect the questionnaires. Once everyone has finished, collect the answer sheets or close the online survey.
  • Debrief participants. Briefly explain the purpose of the study and answer any remaining questions. Thank them for their participation.

Reliability and Validity

The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam has been extensively evaluated for its reliability and validity, demonstrating its effectiveness as a tool for measuring individual attitudes towards Islam:

Reliability:

  • Internal consistency: The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam has high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients typically exceeding 0.80, indicating strong agreement between the individual items.
  • Test-retest reliability: The SF-SAI demonstrates good test-retest reliability, meaning scores tend to remain stable over time, even when administered on separate occasions.

Validity:

  • Content validity: The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam covers a wide range of relevant topics related to attitudes towards Islam, including beliefs, feelings, and behavioral intentions.
  • Construct validity: The SF-SAI shows correlations with other measures of related constructs, such as prejudice and ethnocentrism, supporting its ability to capture the intended concept.
  • Criterion validity: The SF-SAI scores are associated with relevant behaviors, such as willingness to interact with Muslims and support policies related to Islam.
  • Factorial validity: Research indicates that the SF-SAI consists of three distinct factors: affective, cognitive, and behavioral, representing different aspects of attitudes towards Islam.
  • Cross-cultural validity: The SF-SAI has been translated and validated in various languages, suggesting its generalizability across different cultural contexts.

Available Versions

23-Items

Reference

Francis, L. J., Sahin, A., & Al-Failakawi, F. (2008). Psychometric properties of two Islamic measures among young adults in Kuwait: the Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam and the Sahin Index of Islamic Moral Values. Journal of Muslim Mental Health3(1), 9-24.

Important Link

Scale File:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam?
A: The SF-SAI is a self-report questionnaire that measures individual attitudes towards Islam.

Q: How many items are on The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam?
A: The standard SF-SAI has 20 items, but a shorter 10-item version (SF-SAI-S) is also available.

Q: What aspects of attitude does The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam measure?
A: The SF-SAI measures three key aspects:

  • Affective: Feelings towards Islam, such as warmth, trust, and liking.
  • Cognitive: Beliefs about Islam, such as its compatibility with Western values and its influence on the world.
  • Behavioral: Willingness to engage with Muslims and Islamic practices.

Q: How is The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam scored?
A: Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes towards Islam.

Q: How reliable and valid is The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam?
A: The SF-SAI has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure, with strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and evidence of content, construct, criterion, and cross-cultural validity.

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment