Table of Contents
Surface Warfare Officer Human Factors Attitudes Questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Surface Warfare Officer Human Factors Attitudes Questionnaire”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Surface Warfare Officer Human Factors Attitudes Questionnaire
Author Details
O’Connor, Paul
Translation Availability
not sure
Background/Description
O’Connor developed the Surface Warfare Officer Human Factors Attitudes Questionnaire to assess the attitudes of U.S. Navy Surface Warfare Officers towards human factors that have been identified as causal to mishaps in high-risk work environments. The questionnaire was assessed for internal reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha, and nine items were dropped from the original questionnaire to increase Alpha levels.
However, the decision-making factor had negative Alpha scores and dropping items did not improve it. The Naval Aviator Human Factors (NAHF) questionnaire was adapted for SWOs, resulting in a 22-item questionnaire with four proposed factors: My Stress, The Stress of Others, Communication, and Command Responsibility. During the confirmatory factor analysis, four items were discarded.
Scoring, Administration and Interpretation
N/A
Reliability and Validity
After administering the Surface Warfare Officer Human Factors Attitudes Questionnaire to a sample of U.S. Navy surface warfare officers, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to identify the underlying factors that best explain the attitudes towards human factors. The analysis revealed a four-factor model that was found to be an appropriate fit for the data collected.
It is noteworthy that the four-factor model identified in this study was similar to the model derived from a sample of Naval Aviators, suggesting that these factors may be important across different domains within the military.
The four factors identified by the analysis were My Stress, The Stress of Others, Communication, and Command Responsibility. These factors represent different aspects of human factors that are relevant to the safe and effective operation of ships in high-risk environments.
By identifying the key factors that contribute to human performance in these contexts, the SWO HFAQ can be used to inform the development of training programs that enhance the human factors skills of surface warfare officers, ultimately improving safety and mission effectiveness.
Available Versions
38-Items
Reference
O’Connor, P. (2011). “An evaluation of the effectiveness of bridge resource management training”. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21(4), 357-374.
Important Link
Scale File:
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
