Table of Contents
Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack Questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack Questionnaire ”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack Questionnaire
Author Details
Dodge & Coie, 1987 and Raine, Dodge, Loeber, et al., unpublished
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack is a questionnaire used to assess the frequency of proactive and reactive aggressive behavior in male students aged 7-16. It consists of 26 items that capture different aspects of aggression. The questionnaire was developed by Dodge and Coie in 1987 and later refined by Raine, Dodge, Loeber, et al. (unpublished).
The questionnaire measures two distinct types of aggression: reactive aggression and proactive aggression. Reactive aggression refers to impulsive, hostile, or defensive aggression that occurs in response to perceived threats or provocations. Proactive aggression, on the other hand, involves deliberate and planned aggression that is intended to achieve specific goals or rewards.
The internal consistency of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire has been found to be high, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 for reactive aggression and 0.86 to 0.91 for proactive aggression. This indicates that the items within each subscale consistently measure the intended construct.
Researchers and practitioners use this questionnaire to assess aggressive behavior in male students and gain insights into the different motivations and triggers behind their aggression. The results can be used to inform intervention programs, develop strategies for managing aggression, and track changes in aggression over time.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
The administrator provides an introduction to the questionnaire, explaining its purpose and assuring confidentiality. Clear instructions are given to the participants about how to respond to the items.
Self-report format: The Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire is typically self-administered, meaning that participants individually complete the questionnaire by themselves. They read each item and choose the response option that best reflects their own behavior.
Response format: The questionnaire consists of 26 items that measure both reactive aggression and proactive aggression. Each item is typically rated on a Likert-type scale, with response options ranging from “Never” to “Always” or using a numerical scale to indicate frequency or intensity of aggression.
Completion time: Participants are given sufficient time to complete the questionnaire, ensuring that they have enough time to read and respond to each item accurately. The completion time may vary depending on the individual’s reading ability and response speed.
Scoring: After the participants have completed the questionnaire, the responses are scored to calculate separate scores for reactive aggression and proactive aggression. Scoring procedures may differ depending on the specific version or adaptation of the questionnaire being used.
Reliability and Validity
Since the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire is an adaptation or modification of the original Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire, there may not be specific reliability and validity data available for the FastTrack version itself. However, I can provide information on the reliability and validity of the original Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire developed by Dodge and Coie in 1987.
Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the measurements obtained from a questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability is commonly assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which measures the extent to which items within a scale or subscale correlate with each other.
For the original Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire, Dodge and Coie reported internal consistency reliabilities of 0.84 to 0.90 for reactive aggression and 0.86 to 0.91 for proactive aggression. These coefficients suggest that the items within each subscale are highly correlated, indicating good internal consistency.
Validity refers to the extent to which a questionnaire measures what it intends to measure. There are different types of validity that can be assessed, including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity.
Content validity: The content of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire was derived from theoretical frameworks and expert judgments to ensure that it covers the relevant aspects of reactive and proactive aggression.
Criterion-related validity: Criterion-related validity assesses how well the questionnaire correlates with other measures that assess similar constructs. For the Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire, researchers have examined its correlations with other aggression measures and observed significant associations, providing evidence for criterion-related validity.
Construct validity: Construct validity assesses the extent to which a questionnaire measures the underlying construct it is intended to measure. Studies have found that the Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire demonstrates significant associations with other constructs related to aggression, such as impulsivity, hostility, and social functioning, supporting its construct validity.
Available Versions
26-Items
Reference
N/A
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the purpose of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire?
A: The purpose of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire is to assess the frequency of proactive and reactive aggressive behavior in male students aged 7-16. It helps researchers and practitioners gain insights into the different motivations and triggers behind aggression and can be used to inform intervention programs and track changes in aggression over time.
Q: How many items are in the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire?
A: The Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire consists of 26 items that capture different aspects of proactive and reactive aggression. These items are designed to measure the frequency of aggressive behavior.
Q: Who developed the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire?
A: The specific authors or researchers associated with the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire are not mentioned in the available information. However, the original development of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire can be attributed to Kenneth A. Dodge and John D. Coie in 1987.
Q: What is the reliability of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire?
A: The available information states that the internal consistency of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire is high. The reliability estimates reported for the original Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire developed by Dodge and Coie in 1987 were 0.84 to 0.90 for reactive aggression and 0.86 to 0.91 for proactive aggression. These coefficients indicate good internal consistency.
Q: What is the validity of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire?
A: The validity of the Reactive/Proactive Aggression-FastTrack questionnaire, specifically, is not mentioned in the available information. However, the original Reactive/Proactive Aggression questionnaire has been found to demonstrate content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. It is derived from theoretical frameworks, shows significant associations with other aggression measures, and correlates with related constructs, such as impulsivity and social functioning.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
