Nonphysical Aggression scale – Pittsburgh Youth Study

by Psychology Roots
96 views
A+A-
Reset

Nonphysical Aggression scale – Pittsburgh Youth Study

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Nonphysical Aggression scale – Pittsburgh Youth Study”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About Scale Name

Scale Name

Nonphysical Aggression scale – Pittsburgh Youth Study

Author Details

Rolf Loeber, David P. Farrington, Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, and Marjan Van Kammen.

Translation Availability

Not Sure

Nonphysical Aggression scale - Pittsburgh Youth Study
Nonphysical Aggression scale – Pittsburgh Youth Study

Background/Description

The Pittsburgh Youth Study is a longitudinal research project that aims to understand the development and outcomes of aggressive behavior in children and adolescents. As part of this study, the researchers developed a scale to measure nonphysical aggression.

The study was conducted by Rolf Loeber, David P. Farrington, Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, and Marjan Van Kammen in 1998. It initially included male students who were in grades 1, 4, and 7 in either 1987 or 1988. These participants were followed over an extended period, tracking their aggressive behaviors and examining the potential consequences in adulthood.

The Nonphysical Aggression scale within the Pittsburgh Youth Study is designed to assess various forms of nonphysical aggressive behaviors. This includes behaviors such as arguing, bragging, seeking attention, and disobeying parents and teachers. The scale consists of 16 items that capture different manifestations of nonphysical aggression.

One important aspect of the scale is its high internal consistency, with a reported reliability coefficient of .85. This indicates that the items within the scale consistently measure the construct of nonphysical aggression, providing a reliable assessment tool for researchers.

The study’s focus on nonphysical aggression is significant as it expands the understanding of aggressive behavior beyond physical aggression. By examining behaviors such as arguing and attention-seeking, the researchers aimed to gain insight into a broader range of aggressive behaviors that can have adverse effects on individuals’ lives.

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

The administration of the Nonphysical Aggression scale within the Pittsburgh Youth Study involved the following procedures:

Selection of Participants: The study initially included male students who were in grades 1, 4, and 7 in either 1987 or 1988. These participants were selected from schools in the Pittsburgh area.

Data Collection: The researchers collected data through various methods, including interviews, questionnaires, and observations. The Nonphysical Aggression scale was likely administered through self-report questionnaires or interviews with the participants.

Scale Items: The Nonphysical Aggression scale consists of 16 items that assess different nonphysical aggressive behaviors, such as arguing, bragging, seeking attention, and disobeying parents and teachers. Participants would have been asked to respond to these items based on their own behaviors or experiences.

Scoring: Each item on the Nonphysical Aggression scale would have likely been scored on a Likert-type scale, where participants indicate the frequency or intensity of the behavior being measured. The specific scoring method may vary depending on the scale’s design and the response format used.

Reliability and Validity

The reliability and validity of the Nonphysical Aggression scale within the Pittsburgh Youth Study are important considerations for evaluating its psychometric properties. Although the specific psychometric properties of the scale were not explicitly mentioned in the information provided, I can provide a general overview of reliability and validity concepts.

Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of measurement. It indicates the extent to which the scale produces consistent results when administered multiple times or by different individuals. Internal consistency is one aspect of reliability, and it is often assessed using measures such as Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The information provided indicates that the Nonphysical Aggression scale has an internal consistency of .85. This suggests a high level of reliability, indicating that the items within the scale consistently measure the same construct of nonphysical aggression.

Validity refers to the extent to which a scale measures what it intends to measure and the accuracy of the inferences and conclusions drawn from the scores. There are different types of validity that can be examined, including content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity.

Content validity refers to the extent to which the scale’s items represent the construct being measured. In the case of the Nonphysical Aggression scale, the items were selected to capture various forms of nonphysical aggressive behaviors, such as arguing, bragging, seeking attention, and disobeying parents and teachers. The scale’s content validity would depend on how well these items cover the range of nonphysical aggressive behaviors.

Construct validity refers to the extent to which the scale measures the intended construct and relates to other theoretically related constructs. To establish construct validity, researchers often examine patterns of relationships with other measures and theories. This may involve assessing correlations with other measures of aggression or related constructs, such as impulsivity or conduct problems.

Criterion validity assesses the extent to which the scale’s scores are related to an external criterion or outcome. For example, in the Pittsburgh Youth Study, researchers may have examined whether the Nonphysical Aggression scores predicted later outcomes such as delinquency, academic achievement, or social functioning.

Available Versions

16-Items

Reference

Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. B. (1998). Nonphysical Aggression—Pittsburgh Youth Study. Unpublished raw data.

Important Link

Scale File:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The Pittsburgh Youth Study is a longitudinal research project that aims to understand the development and outcomes of aggressive behavior in children and adolescents. It tracks a cohort of male students from grades 1, 4, and 7 into adulthood to examine the long-term effects of aggression.

Q: What is nonphysical aggression?
A: Nonphysical aggression refers to aggressive behaviors that do not involve physical harm or violence. These behaviors can include arguing, bragging, seeking attention, disobeying parents and teachers, and other forms of verbal or relational aggression.

Q: How was nonphysical aggression measured in the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: Nonphysical aggression was measured using a scale developed specifically for the Pittsburgh Youth Study. The scale consists of 16 items that assess various nonphysical aggressive behaviors such as arguing, bragging, seeking attention, and disobedience.

Q: What is the internal consistency of the Nonphysical Aggression scale?
A: The Nonphysical Aggression scale within the Pittsburgh Youth Study demonstrated a high level of internal consistency, with a reported reliability coefficient of .85. This indicates that the items within the scale consistently measure the construct of nonphysical aggression.

Q: Who were the authors of the Nonphysical Aggression—Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The authors of the Nonphysical Aggression—Pittsburgh Youth Study are Rolf Loeber, David P. Farrington, Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, and Marjan Van Kammen.

Q: What were the goals of the Pittsburgh Youth Study?
A: The Pittsburgh Youth Study aimed to investigate the developmental pathways and outcomes associated with aggressive behavior in children and adolescents. It sought to understand the long-term consequences of aggression and delinquency and identify factors that contribute to these behaviors.

Q: Did the Pittsburgh Youth Study only focus on nonphysical aggression?
A: No, while the specific question pertains to the Nonphysical Aggression scale, the Pittsburgh Youth Study examined various forms of aggression, including both physical and nonphysical aggression. The study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of aggressive behavior across different domains.

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.