Table of Contents
Emotion Control Questionnaire (ECQ2)
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Emotion Control Questionnaire (ECQ2)”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Emotion Control Questionnaire (ECQ2)
Scale Name
Emotion Control Questionnaire (ECQ2)
Author Details
Derek Roger and Bahman Najarian
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Emotion Control Questionnaire 2 (ECQ2), developed by Derek Roger and Bahman Najarian in 1989, delves deeper into understanding how individuals manage their emotions compared to its predecessor, the ECQ. This 56-item self-report questionnaire aims to assess various facets of emotional control across four key dimensions:
- Cognitive Reappraisal: This dimension explores the tendency to reinterpret situations and emotions to lessen their impact.
- Emotional Suppression: Individuals with high scores on this dimension tend to bottle up their emotions rather than express them openly.
- Expression Control: This facet focuses on managing the outward display of emotions, considering the appropriateness of expression in different situations.
- Impulsivity: Similar to the original ECQ, this dimension measures the propensity to act without considering the potential consequences.
By answering statements on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), individuals provide insights into their preferred strategies for navigating emotional experiences. The ECQ2 has emerged as a valuable tool in research exploring emotional regulation, its links to mental health, and its role in various psychological processes. It has been used in diverse populations, offering valuable insights into individual differences in emotional control and its potential impact on overall well-being.
However, it’s important to remember that self-report measures like the ECQ2 are susceptible to biases and may not capture the full picture of emotional control. While it serves as a useful starting point for understanding emotional regulation, further investigation and individual assessments might be necessary for a comprehensive picture.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Introduction: Briefly explain the purpose of the questionnaire, emphasizing its anonymity and voluntary participation. Assure participants that there are no “right” or “wrong” answers.
- Distribution: Hand out the questionnaires and answer sheets (if applicable).
- Instructions: Clearly explain the format and response options (typically a 5-point Likert scale). Read aloud any specific instructions mentioned on the questionnaire itself.
- Questions: Allow participants ample time to read and respond to each item carefully. Address any immediate questions without offering guidance on responses.
- Collection: Once finished, collect the completed questionnaires and answer sheets discreetly. Thank participants for their time.
Reliability and Validity
The Emotion Control Questionnaire 2 (ECQ2) exhibits generally good reliability and validity across various studies, making it a valuable tool for assessing emotional control. However, it’s important to consider both its strengths and limitations.
- Internal consistency: The ECQ2 shows good internal consistency, with alpha coefficients ranging from .74 to .86 across its subscales, indicating the items within each domain measure the same construct reliably.
- Test-retest reliability: Studies have reported moderate to high test-retest reliability over varying time intervals (7 weeks to 2 years), suggesting the questionnaire yields consistent results over time.
- Content validity: The content of the items clearly relates to the four domains of emotional control (cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, expression control, impulsivity), supporting its face validity.
- Concurrent validity: The ECQ2 shows moderate correlations with other measures of related constructs, such as anxiety, depression, and impulsivity, indicating its ability to capture relevant aspects of emotional control.
- Discriminant validity: The ECQ2 demonstrates ability to differentiate between groups expected to differ in emotional control, further supporting its validity.
Limitations:
- Self-report bias: As with any self-report measure, the ECQ2 is susceptible to biases like social desirability and memory lapses, potentially affecting its accuracy.
- Limited scope: The ECQ2 focuses on conscious strategies for emotional control and might miss unconscious or automatic emotion regulation processes.
- Cultural sensitivity: While available in some other languages, cultural adaptations are important to ensure accurate assessments across diverse populations.
Available Versions
56-Items
Reference
- Roger, D. & Najarian, B. (1989). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring emotion control. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(8), 845-853.
- Roger, D. & Najarian, B. (1998). The relationship between emotional rumination and cortisol secretion under stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(4), 531-538
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ECQ2?
A 56-item self-report questionnaire assessing how people manage emotions.
What does it measure?
Four key aspects of emotional control: Cognitive reappraisal (reframing situations), Emotional suppression (holding back emotions), Expression control (managing outward displays), and Impulsivity (acting without thinking)
Who can use it?
Adults aged 18+ in research settings or clinical contexts.
How is it administered?
Individually, takes 10-15 minutes to complete.
Is it reliable and valid?
Yes, generally good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, along with evidence for content, concurrent, and discriminant validity.
Are there limitations?
Yes, susceptible to self-report biases and limited in scope (focuses on conscious strategies).
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
