Table of Contents
Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT)
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT)”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT)
Author Details
Rong Su, Louis Tay, and Ed Diener
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
he Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) is a 54-item self-report measure of psychological well-being. It was developed by Rong Su, Louis Tay, and Ed Diener (2014) to measure a broad range of positive functioning, including social support, community, trust, respect, belonging, engagement, skill, learning, accomplishment, self-efficacy, self-worth, meaning, optimism, satisfaction with life, and positive feelings.
The CIT was developed based on the Salutogenic Model of Health, which posits that health is not simply the absence of disease, but rather the presence of positive functioning. The CIT measures 18 dimensions of positive functioning, which are grouped into seven core dimensions:
- Relationships: Social support, community, trust, and respect
- Engagement: Engagement, skill, learning, and accomplishment
- Mastery: Self-efficacy and self-worth
- Autonomy: Control and lack of loneliness
- Meaning: Meaning and purpose in life
- Optimism: Optimism and hope
- Subjective well-being: Satisfaction with life and positive feelings
The CIT has excellent psychometric properties and has been used in a variety of populations, including adults, adolescents, and older adults. It has been shown to be reliable and valid, and to predict important health outcomes, such as physical health, mental health, and life satisfaction.
The CIT is a valuable tool for assessing psychological well-being. It can be used to identify individuals who are thriving, as well as those who may be struggling. The CIT can also be used to track changes in an individual’s level of thriving over time.
The CIT can be used by researchers, clinicians, and other professionals to assess psychological well-being. It can also be used by individuals to self-assess their own well-being. The CIT is a valuable tool for promoting positive functioning and improving quality of life.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
To administer the CIT, you will need a copy of the scale and a pencil. You will also need to provide instructions to the individuals taking the scale. The instructions are as follows:
- Read each item carefully and decide how strongly you agree or disagree with the statement.
- Use the following scale to indicate your agreement or disagreement:
- 1 = Strongly disagree
- 2 = Disagree
- 3 = Somewhat disagree
- 4 = Somewhat agree
- 5 = Agree
- 6 = Strongly agree
- Do not skip any items.
- If you are unsure how to answer an item, leave it blank.
Reliability and Validity
The Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) has excellent psychometric properties. It has been shown to be reliable and valid in a variety of populations, including adults, adolescents, and older adults.
Reliability refers to the consistency of the CIT scores. The CIT has been shown to have high internal consistency, meaning that the items on the scale are all measuring the same construct. The CIT also has good test-retest reliability, meaning that scores on the scale are consistent over time.
Validity refers to the extent to which the CIT measures what it is supposed to measure. The CIT has been shown to have convergent validity, meaning that it is correlated with other measures of psychological well-being. The CIT also has discriminant validity, meaning that it is not correlated with measures of ill-being.
In addition to its psychometric properties, the CIT has also been shown to predict important health outcomes, such as physical health, mental health, and life satisfaction. This suggests that the CIT is a valid measure of psychological well-being and can be used to assess individuals’ overall well-being.
Here are some of the findings from the research on the reliability and validity of the CIT:
- The CIT has high internal consistency, with alpha coefficients ranging from 0.71 to 0.96.
- The CIT has good test-retest reliability, with correlations ranging from 0.75 to 0.87.
- The CIT has convergent validity with other measures of psychological well-being, such as the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being.
- The CIT has discriminant validity with measures of ill-being, such as the Beck Depression Inventory and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale.
- The CIT predicts important health outcomes, such as physical health, mental health, and life satisfaction.
Available Versions
54-Items
Reference
Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 6(3), 251-279.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CIT?
The CIT is a 54-item self-report measure of psychological well-being.
Who developed the CIT?
The CIT was developed by Rong Su, Louis Tay, and Ed Diener.
What does the CIT measure?
The CIT measures 18 dimensions of positive functioning, including social support, community, trust, respect, belonging, engagement, skill, learning, accomplishment, self-efficacy, self-worth, meaning, optimism, satisfaction with life, and positive feelings.
How is the CIT scored?
The CIT is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.
How long does it take to take the CIT?
The CIT takes about 15 minutes to complete.
Where can I find the CIT?
The CIT is available for free online at the following website: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/health-happiness/comprehensive-brief-inventories-of-thriving/
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
