Table of Contents
Adult Dispositional Hope Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Adult Dispositional Hope Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Adult Dispositional Hope Scale
Scale Name
Adult Dispositional Hope Scale
Author Details
C. R. Snyder
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
Feeling hopeful is crucial for navigating life’s challenges. The Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) delves into this very concept, measuring an individual’s overall inclination towards hope. Developed in 1991 by Charles R. Snyder and his team, it’s become a widely used tool in psychology.
More than just positivity, the ADHS taps into two key components:
- Agency: This subscale reflects your perceived ability to find pathways to achieve your goals. It gauges your motivation and energy towards pursuing what you desire.
- Pathways: This subscale assesses your capacity to identify and develop different strategies to reach your desired outcomes. It measures your planning and problem-solving abilities.
The scale itself is quite straightforward:
- It consists of 12 short statements (with 4 measuring each subcomponent and 4 acting as fillers).
- You rate your agreement with each statement on a 6-point scale.
- Higher scores indicate a stronger disposition towards hope, characterized by both the belief in your ability to find paths and the capacity to formulate them.
What good does it do?
The ADHS has found its place in various research and clinical settings, helping in:
- Understanding individual differences in hope levels.
- Predicting how well someone might cope with challenges or achieve their goals.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at boosting hope.
Remember:
- While reliable, the ADHS is not a diagnostic tool.
- Interpreting scores requires a qualified professional considering the individual’s context and other factors.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Create a comfortable and confidential environment: Ensure participants feel safe and secure answering personal questions.
- Provide instructions: Briefly explain the purpose of the ADHS and how to answer the questions. Emphasize anonymity and voluntary participation.
- Distribute the scale: Hand out copies of the ADHS to participants.
- Allow ample time for completion: The ADHS is quick and takes around 5-10 minutes to finish.
- Collect the completed scales: Ensure all copies are returned and accounted for.
Reliability and Validity
The Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) has been extensively researched and generally demonstrates good reliability and validity. Here’s a breakdown of what that means:
- Internal consistency: Measures how consistent the items within the scale are in assessing the same construct (hope).
- The ADHS typically shows good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha scores ranging from 0.70 to 0.86 for the Agency subscale and 0.63 to 0.86 for the Pathways subscale.
- Test-retest reliability: Measures how stable the scale is over time.
- Studies have shown moderate to high test-retest reliability with correlations ranging from 0.73 to 0.85 over various time intervals.
- Content validity: Assesses whether the scale taps into the intended construct (hope).
- The ADHS items directly target the components of hope as defined by Snyder’s theory.
- Construct validity: Measures how well the scale relates to other constructs it should be associated with.
- The ADHS shows positive correlations with measures of optimism, well-being, and coping, and negative correlations with measures of depression, anxiety, and hopelessness.
- Predictive validity: Measures how well the scale predicts future outcomes.
- Studies have shown that higher hope scores on the ADHS are associated with better academic performance, improved coping with stress, and better long-term health outcomes.
Available Versions
12-Items
Reference
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., … & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(4), 570.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is it?
Measures an individual’s overall tendency to maintain hope.
What does it assess?
Two components: Agency (belief in ability to find paths) and Pathways (ability to identify strategies).
How is it administered?
Self-report questionnaire with 12 short statements.
Is it reliable and valid?
Yes, shows good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity across multiple studies.
Who can use it?
Adults (not suitable for children/adolescents).
What are its limitations?
Self-reported, influenced by individual interpretation.
Not a diagnostic tool.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
