Table of Contents
Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale
Author Details
Peter Wong and Kenneth Law
Translation Availability
Spanish, Chinese, and Turkish, and others.
Background/Description
Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to recognize, understand, and regulate emotions, both in oneself and in others. In recent years, there has been growing interest in EI and its role in personal and professional success.
The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) was developed by Peter Wong and Kenneth Law in 2002 as a measure of EI. The WLEIS is based on a theoretical model of EI that includes four domains: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management.
The scale consists of 16 items that assess each of these domains, with four items for each domain. Respondents rate their level of agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. For example, one item in the self-awareness domain asks, “I am aware of my emotions as I experience them”. In contrast, an item in the social awareness domain asks, “I can sense how people are feeling even before they speak”.
The WLEIS has been used in research studies and in organizational and clinical settings to assess individuals’ levels of EI. It has been found to be a reliable and valid measure of EI and has been translated into several languages for use in various cultural contexts.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) is a self-report questionnaire that can be administered individually or in a group setting. Respondents rate their level of agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”.
Once all items have been completed, the scores for each domain (self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management) are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. The total score for the WLEIS is the sum of all 16 items.
Interpretation of the WLEIS scores requires some understanding of the theoretical model of EI that the scale is based on. Scores on each domain and on the total scale can be compared to normative data or to cutoff scores to determine whether an individual’s level of EI is high, average, or low.
It is important to note that the WLEIS is a self-report measure, which means that it relies on individuals’ perceptions of their own emotional abilities. As such, it is possible that scores on the WLEIS may be influenced by factors such as social desirability bias or lack of insight into one’s own emotional abilities.
Reliability and Validity
The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) has been found to be a reliable and valid measure of emotional intelligence (EI).
Reliability refers to the consistency of scores obtained from a measure. The WLEIS has demonstrated good internal consistency, which means that the items within each domain and the overall scale are highly correlated with each other. Test-retest reliability has also been found to be acceptable, indicating that scores obtained from the WLEIS are stable over time.
Validity refers to the extent to which a measure actually measures what it is intended to measure. The WLEIS has been found to have good construct validity, which means that it correlates highly with other measures of EI and with related constructs, such as social competence and well-being. The WLEIS has also demonstrated good discriminant validity, meaning that it is able to distinguish between individuals with high and low levels of EI.
Available Versions
16-Items
Reference
Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 483-496.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is emotional intelligence?
A: Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to recognize and manage one’s own emotions, as well as to understand and influence the emotions of others. It is often seen as a key component of effective interpersonal relationships and leadership.
Q: What is the WLEIS?
A: The WLEIS is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure an individual’s level of emotional intelligence across four domains: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management.
Q: How long does it take to complete the WLEIS?
A: The WLEIS consists of 16 items and can typically be completed in 5-10 minutes.
Q: Can the WLEIS be used to diagnose emotional disorders?
A: No, the WLEIS is not designed to diagnose emotional disorders. It is a measure of perceived emotional abilities, not a diagnostic tool.
Q: Is the WLEIS available in languages other than English?
A: Yes, the WLEIS has been translated into several languages, including Spanish, Chinese, and Turkish, among others. However, it is important to ensure that any translated versions of the WLEIS have been properly validated and are appropriate for use in the specific cultural and linguistic context in which they will be used.
Q: Is the WLEIS the only measure of emotional intelligence?
A: No, there are many different measures of emotional intelligence, each with their own strengths and limitations. The WLEIS is one of the more widely used and researched measures of EI, but it should be used in conjunction with other measures and with careful consideration of its limitations.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
