Table of Contents
The Neophilia Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Neophilia Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
The Neophilia Scale
Author Details
LAIN WALKER AND KEITH GIBBINS
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
This questionnaire consisted of fifty questions, and each was graded on a Likert scale ranging from one to five points. The appendix includes not only this information but also the item-total correlations, means, and standard deviations in their entirety. The sum of the agreement scores was used to construct the scale scores after taking into consideration the direction in which the items were switched around.
Because of this, it was possible to devise a scale in which higher scores indicated a stronger capacity for adaptability to changing circumstances. Initially, the scale was designed to be utilized for an entirely other purpose. As a consequence of this, several of the items on the list of 50 are not the most effective ones to make use of in order to get an accurate assessment on neophilia. In spite of this, each item was preserved for the purpose of the preliminary analyses of the data.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
Provide clear instructions to participants on how to complete the Neophilia Scale. Explain that the scale consists of 50 statements and that they will be asked to rate the extent to which they agree or disagree with each statement on a five-point Likert scale.
Reverse the score (5 = 1, 4 = 2, 3 = 3, 2 = 4, 1 = 5) for the following items: 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35, 37, and 38. After completing this step, add your responses
to the items.
Reliability and Validity
The reliability and validity of the 50-Item Neophilia Scale have been assessed in several studies. Studies have generally found that the Neophilia Scale has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients typically above 0.80 and test-retest correlations ranging from 0.67 to 0.92.
Available Versions
50-Items
38-Items
Reference
Walker, I., & Gibbins, K. (1989). Expecting the Unexpected: An Explanation of Category Width. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 715-724.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the authors of the Neophilia Scale?
The authors of the Neophilia Scale are Lain Walker and Keith Gibbins.
Is the Neophilia Scale available in other languages?
It is not clear if the Neophilia Scale is available in other languages.
How is the Neophilia Scale administered and scored?
Participants are asked to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale. The score is reversed for certain items and then the responses are added together.
What is the reliability and validity of the Neophilia Scale?
Several studies have found that the Neophilia Scale has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients typically above 0.80 and test-retest correlations ranging from 0.67 to 0.92.
Are there different versions of the Neophilia Scale?
Yes, there are 50-item and 38-item versions of the Neophilia Scale.
What is the reference for the Neophilia Scale?
The reference for the Neophilia Scale is: Walker, I., & Gibbins, K. (1989). Expecting the Unexpected: An Explanation of Category Width. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 715-724.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
