Internal consistency and validity of a new physical workload questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the article on “Internal consistency and validity of a new physical workload questionnaire”. You can read the abstract of the article with a download link. We have thousands of articles in our collection (See articles). You can demand us any article related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you within a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
Abstract of the Article
Aims: To examine the dimensionality, internal consistency, and construct validity of a new physical workload questionnaire in employees with musculoskeletal complaints.
Methods: Factor analysis was applied to the responses in three study populations with musculoskeletal disorders (n = 406, 300, and 557) on 26 items related to physical workload. The internal consistency of the resulting subscales was examined. It was hypothesized that physical workload would vary among different occupational groups. The occupations of all subjects were classified into four groups on the basis of expected workload (heavy physical load; long-lasting postures and repetitive movements; both; no physical load). Construct validity of the subscales created was tested by comparing the subscale scores among these occupational groups.
Results: The pattern of the factor loadings of items was almost identical for the three study populations. Two interpretable factors were found: items related to heavy physical workload loaded highly on the first factor, and items related to static postures or repetitive work loaded highly on the second factor. The first constructed subscale ‘‘heavy physical work’’ had a Cronbach’s an of 0.92 to 0.93 and the second subscale ‘‘long-lasting postures and repetitive movements’’, of 0.86 to 0.87. Six of eight hypotheses regarding the construct validity of the subscales were confirmed.
Conclusions: The results support the internal structure, internal consistency, and validity of the new physical workload questionnaire. Testing this questionnaire in non-symptomatic employees and comparing its performance with objective assessments of physical workload are important next steps in the validation process.
Authors of the Article
- S D M Bot, ([email protected])
- C B Terwee,
- D A W M van der Windt,
- A Feleus,
- S M Bierma-Zeinstra,
- D L Knol,
- L M Bouter,
- J Dekker
Need Any Other Article:
Are you looking for any other article? Don’t Worry, We provide you free and quickly. Just need to create a query in our community.
The purpose of our website is only to help students to assist them in finding the best suitable instrument for their research especially in Pakistan where students waste a lot of time in search of the instruments. It is totally free of cost and only for creating awareness and assisting students and researchers for good researches. Moreover, it is necessary for you to take the permission of scales from their representative authors before use because copyrights are reserved by the respected authors.
Help Us Improve This Article
Did you find an inaccuracy? We work hard to provide accurate and scientifically reliable information. If you have found an error of any kind, please let us know.
Add comment. we appropriate your effort.
Share with Us
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at [email protected]. We help others on behalf of you.