Table of Contents
Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Scale Name
Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Author Details
Milne‚ M.‚ Hall‚ C‚ & Forwell‚ L.
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
Contrary to the findings of Sordoni et al. (2002), analysis done by Milne et al. (2005) on the ISEQ (referred to in this article as the Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire or AISEQ) revealed a two-factor solution. Instead of using the three divisions of self-efficacy, Milne et al. (2005) combined barrier and scheduling efficacy into one division called coping efficacy, building off the recommendation by Maddux (1995) that the two types were alike because they were both largely self-regulatory. The authors found a significant difference between task and coping self-efficacy in their first study conducted for the article, with the second study maintaining that there indeed was a difference between task and coping self-efficacy.
Athletes facing injuries experience not just physical limitations but also psychological challenges. Their confidence in managing the recovery process can significantly impact their rehabilitation journey. The Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AISEQ) emerges as a key tool in this context.
Developed by researchers like M. Milne, C. Hall, and L. Forwell (though authorship isn’t definitively attributed to a single person), the AISEQ assesses an athlete’s self-efficacy in three crucial domains related to injury management.
- Task Self-Efficacy: This section gauges the athlete’s confidence in performing rehabilitation exercises and routines prescribed by healthcare professionals. It essentially measures their belief in their ability to do the physical work required for recovery.
- Barrier Self-Efficacy: This part delves into the athlete’s mental strength. It assesses their confidence in overcoming obstacles that might hinder their rehabilitation. Obstacles could be pain, discomfort, social pressures, or even a lack of motivation. A high score in this area indicates the athlete’s belief in their ability to stay focused and committed despite challenges.
- Scheduling Self-Efficacy: Rehabilitation exercises often need to be incorporated into busy schedules. The AISEQ measures the athlete’s confidence in effectively managing their time to complete rehabilitation tasks alongside other commitments. A high score suggests they believe they can juggle their schedule to prioritize recovery.
By measuring self-efficacy in these specific areas, the AISEQ provides valuable insights for sports medicine professionals. Understanding an athlete’s confidence levels allows them to tailor rehabilitation programs. If an athlete scores low in a particular domain, the professional can address those concerns and provide additional support to boost their self-efficacy and optimize the rehabilitation process.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Preparation:
- The healthcare professional administering the AISEQ should ensure they understand the questionnaire and its scoring system.
They should also create a comfortable and private environment for athletes to complete it.
- The healthcare professional administering the AISEQ should ensure they understand the questionnaire and its scoring system.
- Introduction:
- The healthcare professional explains the purpose of the questionnaire, which is to understand the athlete’s confidence in managing their injury rehabilitation.
- They should emphasize that there are no right or wrong answers and encourage athletes to be honest in their responses.
- Completion:
- The athlete is provided with the questionnaire and instructed to read each statement carefully.
- Each statement typically uses a Likert scale, where athletes rate their level of agreement (e.g., “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”). They mark their response for each statement on the answer sheet.
Clarification (Optional): - The healthcare professional might be available to answer any questions the athlete has about the questionnaire items.
Reliability and Validity
The Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AISEQ) shows promise as a reliable and valid tool for measuring self-efficacy in athletes recovering from injuries. Here’s a breakdown of the evidence:
- Internal Consistency: Studies report good internal consistency, meaning the different items within each subscale (task, barrier, scheduling) measure the same construct effectively. Common measures like Cronbach’s alpha coefficient often exceed .8, indicating strong internal consistency.
- Content Validity: The AISEQ items directly target aspects of self-efficacy relevant to injury rehabilitation, suggesting good content validity.
- Construct Validity: Research suggests the AISEQ measures the intended constructs. For instance, athletes with higher scores tend to report better adherence to rehabilitation programs, supporting the construct of self-efficacy influencing recovery behavior.
Limitations to Consider:
- While research is positive, some studies might involve specific athlete populations or injury types. Further validation for broader application might be beneficial.
- The self-report nature of the AISEQ can be susceptible to social desirability bias, where athletes might provide answers they perceive as more favorable.
Available Versions
10-Items
Reference
- Milne‚ M.‚ Hall‚ C‚ & Forwell‚ L. (2005). Self-efficacy‚ imagery use‚ and adherence to rehabilitation by injured athletes. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation‚ 14(2)‚ 150-167.
- Cressman‚ Joel‚ “Evaluation of the Use of Healing Imagery in Athletic Injury Rehabilitation” (2010). Wilfrid Laurier University. Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). Paper 996.
- Cressman‚ Joel M.‚ Dawson‚ Kimberley A. (2011). Evaluation of the Use of Healing Imagery in Athletic Injury Rehabilitation. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity‚ 6(1)‚ doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1060
- Wesch‚ N.‚ Hall‚ C.‚ Prapavessis‚ H.‚ Maddison‚ R.‚ Bassett‚ S.‚ Foley‚ L.‚ Brooks‚ S.‚ Forwell‚ L. (2011). Self-efficacy‚ imagery use‚ and adherence during injury rehabilitation. Scandinavian Journal of Medical & Science in Sports‚ 24‚ 72-81 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01304.x
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AISEQ?
A questionnaire to measure an athlete’s confidence in managing an injury.
What does it assess?
Self-efficacy in three areas: task (doing rehab exercises), barrier (overcoming obstacles), and scheduling (managing time for rehab).
Who developed it?
Authorship unclear, but research by Milne, Hall, and Forwell (2005) is often cited.
How is it administered?
Athletes self-report their answers on a questionnaire using a Likert scale.
How long does it take?
Usually under 10 minutes.
Is it reliable and valid?
Yes, studies show good internal consistency and construct validity.
Are there limitations?
Yes, validation for specific populations might be ongoing, and social desirability bias is possible.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
