Table of Contents
The Ego Resilience Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Ego Resilience Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
The Ego Resilience Scale
Author Details
Jack Block and Adam Kremen
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Ego Resilience Scale (ERS) is a psychological assessment tool designed to measure an individual’s level of ego resilience. It was developed by Jack Block and William S. Kremen and first introduced in their research article titled “IQ and Ego-Resiliency: Conceptual and Empirical Connections and Separateness” published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 1996.
The ERS was developed as a way to operationalize and quantify ego resilience, which refers to an individual’s ability to adapt and thrive in the face of challenges, stress, and change. Ego resilience involves characteristics such as emotional regulation, flexibility, positive attitudes towards change, and the ability to bounce back from setbacks.
The scale consists of 14 items that capture different aspects of ego resilience. Participants rate each item on a Likert scale, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), based on the extent to which they agree or disagree with each statement. The items cover various dimensions of ego resilience, including emotional control, adaptability, problem-solving skills, and coping abilities.
The ERS provides researchers and practitioners with a standardized and quantifiable measure of ego resilience, allowing for the assessment of individual differences in this psychological construct. By using the scale, researchers can examine the relationship between ego resilience and other variables, such as psychological adjustment, well-being, and the ability to cope with stressors.
The original research by Block and Kremen found that ego resilience, as measured by the ERS, was distinct from measures of intelligence (IQ). They demonstrated that ego resilience predicted positive outcomes independently of IQ, highlighting its unique contribution to individual functioning.
Since its introduction, the Ego Resilience Scale has been utilized in various research studies and clinical settings to explore the role of ego resilience in different domains, including mental health, personality development, and adaptive functioning.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
Prepare the materials: Obtain a copy of the ERS questionnaire, which includes the 14 items. Make sure to include clear instructions for participants on how to respond to the items.
Participant instructions: Provide clear instructions to participants on how to complete the questionnaire. Explain that the purpose of the scale is to measure their level of ego resilience and that they should indicate their agreement or disagreement with each statement based on their own experiences.
Likert scale response: Participants typically respond to each item using a Likert scale format, with options ranging from 1 to 4 or a similar range. The scale options should be clearly labeled, such as 1 (strongly disagree), 2 (disagree), 3 (agree), and 4 (strongly agree). Participants select the option that best represents their agreement with each statement.
Scoring: Once participants have completed the questionnaire, the responses for each item are scored. Each item is typically assigned a numerical value corresponding to the Likert scale response (e.g., 1-4). The scores for all the items are then summed to obtain a total score, representing the individual’s level of ego resilience. Higher scores indicate greater ego resilience.
Reliability and Validity
Internal consistency: The ERS has demonstrated good internal consistency, indicating that the items within the scale are measuring the same underlying construct of ego resilience. Studies have reported high Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, typically ranging from 0.70 to 0.85, indicating strong internal reliability.
Validity:
Construct validity: The ERS has shown evidence of construct validity, which refers to the extent to which the scale measures the intended construct of ego resilience. Block and Kremen (1996) initially developed the ERS based on theoretical considerations and empirical research on ego resilience. The scale items were designed to capture different aspects of ego resilience, such as adaptability, emotional regulation, and problem-solving abilities.
Criterion-related validity: The ERS has been examined for its ability to predict and relate to other variables of interest. For example, studies have found positive associations between ego resilience, psychological well-being, positive emotions, and adaptive coping strategies. Additionally, the ERS has been used to predict outcomes such as academic achievement, occupational success, and resilience to stress.
Convergent and divergent validity: The ERS has shown evidence of convergent validity, demonstrating positive correlations with other constructs related to psychological adjustment and resilience. Conversely, it has also demonstrated divergent validity by showing weaker or non-significant correlations with constructs that are conceptually distinct from ego resilience.
Available Versions
14-Items
Reference
Block‚ Jack and Kremen‚ Adam M. (1996). IQ and Ego-Resiliency: Conceptual and Empirical Connections and Separateness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology‚ 70(2): 349-361.
Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). Ego-Resiliency Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests.
https://doi.org/10.1037/t01072-000
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the purpose of the Ego Resilience Scale?
A: The ERS is designed to measure an individual’s level of ego resilience, which refers to their ability to adapt and thrive in the face of challenges, stress, and change. It provides a standardized measure to assess individual differences in ego resilience.
Q: How many items are there in the Ego Resilience Scale?
A: The ERS consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of ego resilience. Participants rate each item on a Likert scale to indicate their agreement or disagreement with each statement.
Q: How is the Ego Resilience Scale scored?
A: Each item on the ERS is typically scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. Participants’ responses to the items are summed to obtain a total score, which represents their level of ego resilience. Higher scores indicate greater ego resilience.
Q: What is the reliability of the Ego Resilience Scale?
A: The ERS has demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, with high Cronbach’s alpha coefficients reported in various studies. The scale items are found to measure the same underlying construct of ego resilience.
Q: Is the Ego Resilience Scale available for public use?
A: The ERS is a copyrighted instrument, so permission is generally required to use it in research or other settings. Researchers and practitioners interested in using the scale should contact the authors, Jack Block and William S. Kremen, or the publishers to obtain proper permissions and guidelines for usage.
Q: What does the Ego Resilience Scale measure?
A: The ERS measures an individual’s level of ego resilience, encompassing traits such as emotional regulation, adaptability, positive attitudes towards change, and the ability to bounce back from setbacks.
Q: Has the validity of the Ego Resilience Scale been established?
A: Yes, the ERS has demonstrated evidence of construct validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and divergent validity in various studies. It has shown associations with related constructs and predicted outcomes in line with theoretical expectations.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
